Introduction Management has become a part and parcel in everyday life, be it at home, office, factory, Government, or in any other organization where a group of human beings assemble for a common purpose, management principles come into play through th
work
Published on March 1, 2004 By bhattathiri In Photography

In a certain place the fishermen were catching fish. A kite swooped down and snatched a fish. At the sight of the fish, about twenty crows chased the kite and made a great noise with their cawing.

Whichever way the kite flew with the fish, the crows followed it. The kite flew to the south and the crows followed it there. The kite flew to the north and still the crows followed after it. The kite went east and west, but with the same result. As the kite began to fly about in confusion, it tired itself out and let go of the fish in its mouth. The crows at once let the kite alone and flew after the fish. Thus relieved of its worries, the kite sat on the branch of a tree and thought, "That wretched fish was the root of all my troubles. I have now got rid of it and therefore I am at peace."

As long as a man has the fish, that is, worldly desires, he must perform actions and consequently suffer from worry, anxiety and restlessness. No sooner does he renounce these desires than his activities fall away and he enjoys peace of soul.

The kite cannot live without the fish, for it needs the fish to survive. But luckily for us, there is no compulsion. Desires and Suffering come bundled together in a take-it-or-leave-it package. No doubt then, that Krishna tells us in the Bhagavad-Gita:

B.G 2.62, 63, 64:

dhyäyato vishayän pumsah sangas teshüpajäyate
sangät sanjäyate kämah kämät krodho 'bhijäyate

"While contemplating the objects of the senses, a person develops attachment for them, and from such attachment lust develops, and from lust anger arises."

krodhäd bhavati sammohah sammohät smrti-vibhramah
smrti-bhramshäd buddhi-näsho buddhi-näshät pranashyati

"From anger, delusion arises, and from delusion bewilderment of memory. When memory is bewildered, intelligence is lost, and when intelligence is lost, one falls down again into the material pool."

räga-dvesha-vimuktais tu vishayän indriyash charan
ätma-vashyair vidheyätmä prasädam adhigacchati

"One who can control his senses by practicing the regulated principles of freedom can obtain the complete mercy of the Lord and thus become free from all attachment and aversion."

.



Comments
on Mar 01, 2004
It is in suffering that one grows. The absense of pain and desire is the even constant pull towards mediocrity, and that I swear I will never succumb to.

~Dan
on Mar 01, 2004
wow Dan, I wish I could be like you. I wish I held your knowledge, maybe then I would know how to live my life in such a way as to help others, maybe even help myself, and have a true happiness for once.

Trinitie
on Mar 02, 2004
I am awed by the parallels between this and the spirit of what Jesus taught.  This is so much like many, many of his quotations.
on Mar 02, 2004
I hope none of this is sarcastic, or I'm being visciously mocked.

But I don't think Trin is, so thank you Trin. And Baker I hope you're not referring to the article.. because while Jesus taught extremity and polarity, Buddha teaches mediocrity. Big difference.

~Dan
on Mar 04, 2004
Dan: No, I don't think so. Go back and reread what is being said. It may differ on the eventuality of detatchment, but I could quote you several of Jesus's teachings that are very, very similar in spirit. You can't see the resemblance in the line:

"As long as a man has the fish, that is, worldly desires, he must perform actions and consequently suffer from worry, anxiety and restlessness. No sooner does he renounce these desires than his activities fall away and he enjoys peace of soul."?

From 'rendering unto Ceasar' to plucking out your eye etc., etc. Go and read the sermon on the mount again. I think the similarity is striking, even if, as I said, the purpose of said attatchment is different. We may see it as 'mediocrity', but the Jews who thought Jesus was the militant Messiah they were expecting might have easily called what he accomplished 'mediocrity'. There is much to be learned from the other beliefs, even if they are used to draw different conclusions.
on Mar 04, 2004
Bakerstreet:

...You're wrong. Philosophically you're at least on debatable ground, but you should probably check your facts a bit. First of all, old-testament statutes don't apply since the barrier between man and God was broken (ie the curtain in the temple). Second, Jesus could never have been labeled mediocre in any sense. We was an activist that threatened all sense of tradition by approaching that that nobody else would approach, and accepting those whom it was taboo to accept.

But your last sentence, I definitely agree with.

~Dan
on Mar 04, 2004
"First of all, old-testament statutes don't apply since the barrier between man and God was broken"


I never mentioned the Old Testament. Did I?

"Second, Jesus could never have been labeled mediocre in any sense. We was an activist..."



Hardly so in the perception of the Jews who believed that the Messiah was coming to deliver them from Roman rule and liberate Israel. It was his 'detachment' from the social and political trials of the Jews that made most of them hate him so. He was very mediocre in the eyes of the Jewish religious authority. It was his 'detachment' from the social mores, from the pride and social status of the Pharisees, and the hypocrisy of the 'law' as it was carried out in his time that enraged them. They had no authority over him because he had no attachment to their values.

He didn't want to punish the Romans, he didn't want to elevate himself in the Temple, he didn't want wealth or power. Basically he didn't 'want'. You can't say he was in the business of 'saving souls', because he hadn't been crucified yet. He was teaching detachment from the worldly , so that after his death the worldly wouldn't get in the way.

As a matter of fact, I think the second most annoying thing to many is the 'detatchment' that modern Christians have with the 'world', right behind 'attatchment' to telling other people how to live, lol.  How many times have you heard "This world is not my home"?


bhattathiri: I apologize if it appears that we have turned your blog into a Christian discussion. I respect your beliefs, and mean no offense.

on Mar 06, 2004
Yeah, we'd better quit it and get back on track.. my apologies as well bhatta, no offense meant.

~Dan